|
Post by davisonera on Apr 2, 2006 12:55:32 GMT -5
The commentary for Caves by Peter Davison, Nicola Bryant and Graeme Harper is my fave. Also Earthshock, The Leisure Hive, Rememberance.
|
|
|
Post by Ice Warrior on May 4, 2006 0:07:44 GMT -5
Earthshock was a waste of a Commentry IMO.
|
|
|
Post by Dominic Smith on May 16, 2006 6:27:03 GMT -5
I loved the Earthshock commentary, it was a great laugh.
|
|
|
Post by The Thinker on May 17, 2006 9:57:56 GMT -5
I rather liked the commentary for 'The Three Doctors'. Any story and commentary with funny bits and silly bits added has GOT to good. This explains why I prefer the Graham Williams Doctor Who stories, e.g. City of Death. I like a bit of a chuckle. However, back on topic I thought the commentary for 'Remembrance of the Daleks' was pretty good too.
|
|
|
Post by Dominic Smith on May 28, 2006 12:01:50 GMT -5
The commentary for the new Genesis of the Daleks DVD is pretty good too.
|
|
|
Post by The Thinker on May 28, 2006 12:09:31 GMT -5
The commentary for the new Genesis of the Daleks DVD is pretty good too. Hmm, I'd have voted for that had it been on the poll.
|
|
|
Post by Ice Warrior on May 28, 2006 18:23:20 GMT -5
I loved the Earthshock commentary, it was a great laugh. It was probably a great laugh for you, because you're British. To be it was just full of teasing about on screen appearences and whilst there was some interesting info about the story, there wasn't enough IMO
|
|
|
Post by Dominic Smith on May 29, 2006 1:25:16 GMT -5
I loved the Earthshock commentary, it was a great laugh. It was probably a great laugh for you, because you're British. To be it was just full of teasing about on screen appearances and whilst there was some interesting info about the story, there wasn't enough IMO Very true. I'm not really all that interested in technical info in commentaries, I don't mind listening to some of it but a commentary full f it would put me off. It's nice to have some light-hearted banter so to speak, the technical info you can get from the production subtitles.
|
|
|
Post by The Thinker on May 29, 2006 16:19:44 GMT -5
Earthshock was a waste of a Commentry IMO. What does IMO stand for?
|
|
|
Post by Ice Warrior on May 30, 2006 0:01:08 GMT -5
IMO = In My Opinion
also there is
IMHO = In My Humble Opinion
Anyway, getting back on topic:
The first and foremost reason I listen to Commentries is for the 'behind-the-scenes' stuff.
|
|
|
Post by The Thinker on May 31, 2006 14:36:44 GMT -5
I listen to the commentaries not to pick up technical information but just to listen to the people concerned wittering away about only God knows what. Also I'd like more commentaries from Tom Baker.
|
|
|
Post by The Thinker on May 31, 2006 14:38:54 GMT -5
Ok, I just noticed as of 31/05/2006 that four users posted here, but only three voted, so who didn't vote?
|
|
|
Post by Ice Warrior on Jun 1, 2006 1:55:25 GMT -5
That would be me.
I have only listened to 2 commentaries, so how can I make a judgement of the 30?
|
|
|
Post by The Thinker on Jun 1, 2006 2:20:25 GMT -5
I haven't listened to all 30 commentaries shown above, didn't stop me making a judgment.
|
|
|
Post by Ice Warrior on Jun 1, 2006 2:24:20 GMT -5
I'm not saying it prevents me from making a judgement either, but I can not judge properly if I have not heard them all, and it may be a few years until I do.
Anyway, if it will make you happy, I thought 'The Three Doctors' was a great commentry.
|
|